Skip to main content

Reflections on Portland

While attending a conference in Portland, I walked over a mile each way from my hotel to the convention center, passing the seemingly overwhelmed Portland Rescue Mission. I heard about Portland’s crisis of unhoused individuals, but witnessing it firsthand was a stark and sobering experience. It underscored a deeper national issue: our collective indifference to those most in need.

We live in a country where economic policy often resembles socialism for the ultra-wealthy—through tax breaks and lax enforcement for evaders—while the rest of us are left to navigate a harsh version of free enterprise. That system rewards those with time, talent, and resources, yet for many, careers drain the very creativity and resilience needed to thrive.

Portland, notably, has no sales tax on retail transactions. One wonders whether a modest, targeted tax could help address the emergency. The phrase “affordable housing” rings hollow when the median monthly rent for a two-bedroom, one-bathroom house is approximately $2,600. For many, the cost of shelter alone is a barrier to stability.

The city claims to protect its unhoused population, yet over 7,000 people in Portland and more than 15,000 in Multnomah County remain without stable housing. Seeing someone asleep, lying face down on one of the many beautifully kept bike paths, tells a different story. It’s a painful contradiction.

“Access to justice” is a popular rallying cry, but like “affordable housing,” it often lacks substance. And access to dignity? Simply rebranding "homeless" with "unhoused" does not restore an individual's dignity. This country's promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness remains even more elusive.

Portland, with all its progressive ideals, falls short. To borrow from Morrissey: Life is a pigsty—and in Portland, that truth is hard to ignore.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: Artificial Intelligence Articles

CHATGPT AS THE ENEMY: New Sanctions Against Lawyers Relying on ChatGPT Likely as Jay Edelson Speaks of ChatGPT Encouraging Suicide , Eric Troutman, JDSupra (Feb. 16, 2026) What’s Left For Humans? , Georgia Wells, Wall Street Journal (Feb. 15, 2026) Will LLMs Become Obsolete? , John Werner, Forbes  (Feb. 14, 2026) When AI Isn’t Privileged , Jeffrey Ehrlich et al., JDSupra (Feb. 13, 2026)  The Perils of Blind Faith in Artificial Intelligence , Kristen Coleman & Alan Taylor, JDSupra (Feb. 13, 2026)  Calif. Atty Wins $25K Fee Sanction Over AI Errors , Emily Sawicki,  Law360  (Feb. 11, 2026) OpenAI Is Making the Mistakes Facebook Made. I Quit. , ZoĆ« Hitzig, N.Y. Times (Feb. 11, 2026) No, the human-robot singularity isn’t here. But we must take action to govern AI , Samuel Woolley, The Guardian (Feb. 10, 2026) OpenAI Executive Who Opposed ‘Adult Mode’ Fired for Sexual Discrimination , Georgia Wells, N.Y. Times (Feb. 10, 2026) A.I. Is Giving You a Personaliz...

AI Sanction Cases Archive

2025 Cases In  Med. Buyer's Grp. v. Pence , No. 25-cv-105, 2025 WL 3217751, at *1 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 18, 2025), the court addressed whether the plaintiff's counsel violated Rule 11(b)(2) by submitting briefs containing flawed case citations, including citations to non-existent cases and a case that did not support the cited proposition. The court ordered sanctions, which included a public admonishment of counsel and allowed the defendants to submit motions to recoup reasonable attorney fees incurred due to the flawed citations.  Id.  at *2. The court stated that no further monetary sanctions will be imposed in this case, and failure to comply with these terms may result in contempt.  Id.  After reviewing the defendants' requests, the court awarded $10,000 in attorney fees as sanctions for citing non-existent cases.  Med. Buyer's Grp. , No. 25-cv-105, 2026 WL 149949 (M.D. Ga. Jan. 20, 2026). In  Cruz v. United States , No. 24-cv-1087, 2025 WL 3641170, ...

Miss Criss: The Heart of John Marshall, In the Loop, The John Marshall Law School, Oct. 28, 2012

This article was originally published in The John Marshall Law School's "In The Loop". The article has been edited in part for consistency.   When students leave The John Marshall Law School, they remember a favorite professor, a heart-stopping exam, good times with their study group, teammates in a competition. And, the indelible mark of love is given to students by Miss Marilyn J. Criss. They carry her endearment with them for years. She is a special person who brings a kind spirit to the law school through her warmth, compassion and genuine love for all associated with the law school. What goes on in the classroom is important, but just as important is for students to know they have someone to turn to when they have a problem. Miss Criss, the administrative assistant in Student Affairs, is their shoulder to cry on, the knowledgeable mother who can give advice, and the great confidant. She doesn’t judge. In her eyes, everyone is equal and all deserve respect. “It behoov...