Skip to main content

A New National Anthem?

 On March 3, 1931, President Herbert Hoover signed a bill designating The Star-Spangled Banner as the national anthem of the United States. However, this anthem presents several challenges. Its soaring melody is notoriously difficult to sing, which excludes many voices from full participation. Additionally, its lyrics, written during the War of 1812, reflect a bygone era and struggle to resonate with the diverse experiences of modern Americans.

As an alternative, the song Idiot Country by the electronic music duo of Bernard Sumner (of Joy Division and New Order) and Johnny Marr (of The Smiths, as well as The Pretenders and The The) could serve as the new U.S. national anthem. Released in 1991, this track is a powerful blend of industrial, techno, and rock music, offering a unique and poignant reflection on the United States.

Although Sumner is not widely recognized for his singing talent, his distinctive vocal style is an essential part of New Order's identity and influences his work with Electronic. He even incorporates elements of rap to convey certain aspects of Idiot Country.

On guitar, Johnny Marr weaves sonic tapestries, sculpting melodies and creating a living rhythm that propels the music forward. His signature sound, crafted through layers and effects, transforms his guitar into a chorus of chimes and shimmers, showcasing unexpected beauty within intricately recognizable progressions.

Idiot Country engages with contemporary American realities, such as social and political divisions, consumerism, and the erosion of individual freedoms. Its lyrics, while critical, provide a space for introspection and call for a better future.

Importantly, the song promotes inclusivity, despite some individuals' aversion to that concept. Its driving beat and electronic textures are accessible to a wider audience, transcending traditional musical boundaries. The rhythmic structure encourages movement and fosters a sense of collective energy.

The song is undeniably an artistic powerhouse. Crafted by two influential modern rock musicians, it showcases a masterpiece of electronic music synthesized with powerful guitar riffs, innovative production, and raw emotional intensity. While it was created by Brits, it stands as a testament to American artistic ingenuity.

Changing a national anthem is, of course, a significant undertaking. However, an executive order could potentially turn the trick. Ultimately, Idiot Country offers a powerful symbol for a nation seeking to confront its challenges and strive for a more just and equitable future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: Artificial Intelligence Articles

CHATGPT AS THE ENEMY: New Sanctions Against Lawyers Relying on ChatGPT Likely as Jay Edelson Speaks of ChatGPT Encouraging Suicide , Eric Troutman, JDSupra (Feb. 16, 2026) What’s Left For Humans? , Georgia Wells, Wall Street Journal (Feb. 15, 2026) Will LLMs Become Obsolete? , John Werner, Forbes  (Feb. 14, 2026) When AI Isn’t Privileged , Jeffrey Ehrlich et al., JDSupra (Feb. 13, 2026)  The Perils of Blind Faith in Artificial Intelligence , Kristen Coleman & Alan Taylor, JDSupra (Feb. 13, 2026)  Calif. Atty Wins $25K Fee Sanction Over AI Errors , Emily Sawicki,  Law360  (Feb. 11, 2026) OpenAI Is Making the Mistakes Facebook Made. I Quit. , Zoë Hitzig, N.Y. Times (Feb. 11, 2026) No, the human-robot singularity isn’t here. But we must take action to govern AI , Samuel Woolley, The Guardian (Feb. 10, 2026) OpenAI Executive Who Opposed ‘Adult Mode’ Fired for Sexual Discrimination , Georgia Wells, N.Y. Times (Feb. 10, 2026) A.I. Is Giving You a Personaliz...

AI Sanction Cases Archive

2025 Cases In  Med. Buyer's Grp. v. Pence , No. 25-cv-105, 2025 WL 3217751, at *1 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 18, 2025), the court addressed whether the plaintiff's counsel violated Rule 11(b)(2) by submitting briefs containing flawed case citations, including citations to non-existent cases and a case that did not support the cited proposition. The court ordered sanctions, which included a public admonishment of counsel and allowed the defendants to submit motions to recoup reasonable attorney fees incurred due to the flawed citations.  Id.  at *2. The court stated that no further monetary sanctions will be imposed in this case, and failure to comply with these terms may result in contempt.  Id.  After reviewing the defendants' requests, the court awarded $10,000 in attorney fees as sanctions for citing non-existent cases.  Med. Buyer's Grp. , No. 25-cv-105, 2026 WL 149949 (M.D. Ga. Jan. 20, 2026). In  Cruz v. United States , No. 24-cv-1087, 2025 WL 3641170, ...

Miss Criss: The Heart of John Marshall, In the Loop, The John Marshall Law School, Oct. 28, 2012

This article was originally published in The John Marshall Law School's "In The Loop". The article has been edited in part for consistency.   When students leave The John Marshall Law School, they remember a favorite professor, a heart-stopping exam, good times with their study group, teammates in a competition. And, the indelible mark of love is given to students by Miss Marilyn J. Criss. They carry her endearment with them for years. She is a special person who brings a kind spirit to the law school through her warmth, compassion and genuine love for all associated with the law school. What goes on in the classroom is important, but just as important is for students to know they have someone to turn to when they have a problem. Miss Criss, the administrative assistant in Student Affairs, is their shoulder to cry on, the knowledgeable mother who can give advice, and the great confidant. She doesn’t judge. In her eyes, everyone is equal and all deserve respect. “It behoov...