Skip to main content

No Public Funds (Originally Written April 12, 2024)

There have been recent discussions surrounding the potential allocation of Illinois taxpayer money for the construction of a new stadium for the Chicago White Sox.  Such a decision requires thoroughly evaluating the implications and justification for such an investment.  There key are several reasons why utilizing public funds for this purpose may not serve the best interest of Illinois taxpayers.

With respect to economic considerations, there would be a limited return on investment for Taxpayers.  Historical data from similar projects across the nation suggests that the promised economic returns, in terms of local job creation and increased economic activity, often fall short of projections.  The direct benefits tend to favor the team and its owners disproportionately, leaving taxpayers to bear the financial burden with minimal returns.

In looking at the opportunity cost, allocating substantial public funds towards a stadium diverts critical resources from other pressing needs such as education, infrastructure, healthcare, and public safety.  These areas directly impact the community's well-being and offer more tangible benefits to the taxpayers of Illinois.  In terms of community impact and public opinion, there will be questionable enhancement of community value.  While a new stadium might be viewed as a symbol of city pride or a boost to local identity, the actual contribution to the community's cultural and social fabric is debatable.  The stadium's operation days are limited, and outside of event days, the facility might not serve any significant community purpose.

Additionally, public opinion and priorities will weigh against such an endeavor.  Surveys and studies often show that public opinion is divided on funding sports facilities with taxpayer money, especially when such projects benefit private entities more than the general public.   It is crucial to consider whether public funds should be utilized in accordance with the priorities and needs expressed by the constituents themselves.  Financial sustainability and accountability must be considered.  First, long-term financial burdens may be detrimental.  The financial obligations tied to stadium construction often extend for decades, potentially placing future administrations and taxpayers under considerable strain, especially if projected revenue fails to materialize.

Also, there will be considerable transparency and accountability issues.  Ensuring that the funds are used efficiently and as intended poses significant challenges.  Oversight mechanisms must be robust to prevent misuse of funds, yet such accountability measures are often lacking or insufficient in projects of this nature.

In sum, given the considerations outlined above, it is recommended that a more cautious approach be taken regarding the allocation of Illinois taxpayer money for the construction of a new Chicago White Sox stadium.  Alternative funding strategies should be explored, including greater private investment from the franchise and its benefactors. In doing so, we can ensure that public funds are utilized in a manner that truly benefits the broader community and addresses its most pressing needs.

Ultimately, it would be advisable to engage in a comprehensive public consultation process to gauge taxpayer sentiment and explore all possible funding mechanisms before making a final decision.  This approach will not only ensure transparency but also foster a sense of community ownership and involvement in the decision-making process.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: Artificial Intelligence Articles

CHATGPT AS THE ENEMY: New Sanctions Against Lawyers Relying on ChatGPT Likely as Jay Edelson Speaks of ChatGPT Encouraging Suicide , Eric Troutman, JDSupra (Feb. 16, 2026) What’s Left For Humans? , Georgia Wells, Wall Street Journal (Feb. 15, 2026) Will LLMs Become Obsolete? , John Werner, Forbes  (Feb. 14, 2026) When AI Isn’t Privileged , Jeffrey Ehrlich et al., JDSupra (Feb. 13, 2026)  The Perils of Blind Faith in Artificial Intelligence , Kristen Coleman & Alan Taylor, JDSupra (Feb. 13, 2026)  Calif. Atty Wins $25K Fee Sanction Over AI Errors , Emily Sawicki,  Law360  (Feb. 11, 2026) OpenAI Is Making the Mistakes Facebook Made. I Quit. , ZoĆ« Hitzig, N.Y. Times (Feb. 11, 2026) No, the human-robot singularity isn’t here. But we must take action to govern AI , Samuel Woolley, The Guardian (Feb. 10, 2026) OpenAI Executive Who Opposed ‘Adult Mode’ Fired for Sexual Discrimination , Georgia Wells, N.Y. Times (Feb. 10, 2026) A.I. Is Giving You a Personaliz...

AI Sanction Cases Archive

2025 Cases In  Med. Buyer's Grp. v. Pence , No. 25-cv-105, 2025 WL 3217751, at *1 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 18, 2025), the court addressed whether the plaintiff's counsel violated Rule 11(b)(2) by submitting briefs containing flawed case citations, including citations to non-existent cases and a case that did not support the cited proposition. The court ordered sanctions, which included a public admonishment of counsel and allowed the defendants to submit motions to recoup reasonable attorney fees incurred due to the flawed citations.  Id.  at *2. The court stated that no further monetary sanctions will be imposed in this case, and failure to comply with these terms may result in contempt.  Id.  After reviewing the defendants' requests, the court awarded $10,000 in attorney fees as sanctions for citing non-existent cases.  Med. Buyer's Grp. , No. 25-cv-105, 2026 WL 149949 (M.D. Ga. Jan. 20, 2026). In  Cruz v. United States , No. 24-cv-1087, 2025 WL 3641170, ...

Miss Criss: The Heart of John Marshall, In the Loop, The John Marshall Law School, Oct. 28, 2012

This article was originally published in The John Marshall Law School's "In The Loop". The article has been edited in part for consistency.   When students leave The John Marshall Law School, they remember a favorite professor, a heart-stopping exam, good times with their study group, teammates in a competition. And, the indelible mark of love is given to students by Miss Marilyn J. Criss. They carry her endearment with them for years. She is a special person who brings a kind spirit to the law school through her warmth, compassion and genuine love for all associated with the law school. What goes on in the classroom is important, but just as important is for students to know they have someone to turn to when they have a problem. Miss Criss, the administrative assistant in Student Affairs, is their shoulder to cry on, the knowledgeable mother who can give advice, and the great confidant. She doesn’t judge. In her eyes, everyone is equal and all deserve respect. “It behoov...