Skip to main content

A Sad State of Fandom (Originally Written June 7, 2024)

I write today as a lifelong White Sox fan, but one deeply troubled by the current state and direction of our beloved team. Since 1981, we've experienced one championship and endured many losing seasons, always with the hope of better things to come. However, it has become increasingly clear that the stewardship of our team leaves much to be desired. It is with a heavy heart that I call on my fellow fans to reconsider our support for the team under the current ownership's direction (or lack thereof).

The lack of willingness to invest in quality players is a glaring issue that cannot be overlooked any longer. We've watched as our rivals have strengthened their rosters, making bold moves to compete at the highest level, while our team's commitment to building a championship-caliber squad seems tepid by comparison. This has not only impacted the team’s performance on the field but has dampened the spirit and passion of a fan base eager for success.

Equally concerning is the lack of investment in the surrounding neighborhood. The area around the ballpark could thrive with the right combination of community and commercial development, bringing much-needed jobs and revitalization. Yet, there appears to be a disconnect between the team's success and the prosperity of our community. As a cornerstone institution, there's a responsibility to uplift not just through sports but through meaningful investments that show a commitment to the community's well-being.

Moreover, the sense of entitlement regarding public funds for a new ballpark is troubling. In an era where many face economic hardships, the expectation that taxpayers shoulder the burden for a new stadium without a clear return on investment for the community raises questions about priorities and fairness. The relationship between the team and its community should be symbiotic, not one-sided.

It's with a sense of urgency that I call upon my fellow White Sox fans to demand better. We are not just fans; we are the lifeblood of this team, investing our time, passion, and resources. It's time our loyalty is met with a commitment to excellence, both on and off the field. Until such time, I urge us to rethink our support, hold those in charge accountable, and envision a future where our love for the team is matched by their dedication to us, the fans, and the city we call home.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bibliography: Artificial Intelligence Articles

CHATGPT AS THE ENEMY: New Sanctions Against Lawyers Relying on ChatGPT Likely as Jay Edelson Speaks of ChatGPT Encouraging Suicide , Eric Troutman, JDSupra (Feb. 16, 2026) What’s Left For Humans? , Georgia Wells, Wall Street Journal (Feb. 15, 2026) Will LLMs Become Obsolete? , John Werner, Forbes  (Feb. 14, 2026) When AI Isn’t Privileged , Jeffrey Ehrlich et al., JDSupra (Feb. 13, 2026)  The Perils of Blind Faith in Artificial Intelligence , Kristen Coleman & Alan Taylor, JDSupra (Feb. 13, 2026)  Calif. Atty Wins $25K Fee Sanction Over AI Errors , Emily Sawicki,  Law360  (Feb. 11, 2026) OpenAI Is Making the Mistakes Facebook Made. I Quit. , ZoĆ« Hitzig, N.Y. Times (Feb. 11, 2026) No, the human-robot singularity isn’t here. But we must take action to govern AI , Samuel Woolley, The Guardian (Feb. 10, 2026) OpenAI Executive Who Opposed ‘Adult Mode’ Fired for Sexual Discrimination , Georgia Wells, N.Y. Times (Feb. 10, 2026) A.I. Is Giving You a Personaliz...

AI Sanction Cases Archive

2025 Cases In  Med. Buyer's Grp. v. Pence , No. 25-cv-105, 2025 WL 3217751, at *1 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 18, 2025), the court addressed whether the plaintiff's counsel violated Rule 11(b)(2) by submitting briefs containing flawed case citations, including citations to non-existent cases and a case that did not support the cited proposition. The court ordered sanctions, which included a public admonishment of counsel and allowed the defendants to submit motions to recoup reasonable attorney fees incurred due to the flawed citations.  Id.  at *2. The court stated that no further monetary sanctions will be imposed in this case, and failure to comply with these terms may result in contempt.  Id.  After reviewing the defendants' requests, the court awarded $10,000 in attorney fees as sanctions for citing non-existent cases.  Med. Buyer's Grp. , No. 25-cv-105, 2026 WL 149949 (M.D. Ga. Jan. 20, 2026). In  Cruz v. United States , No. 24-cv-1087, 2025 WL 3641170, ...

Miss Criss: The Heart of John Marshall, In the Loop, The John Marshall Law School, Oct. 28, 2012

This article was originally published in The John Marshall Law School's "In The Loop". The article has been edited in part for consistency.   When students leave The John Marshall Law School, they remember a favorite professor, a heart-stopping exam, good times with their study group, teammates in a competition. And, the indelible mark of love is given to students by Miss Marilyn J. Criss. They carry her endearment with them for years. She is a special person who brings a kind spirit to the law school through her warmth, compassion and genuine love for all associated with the law school. What goes on in the classroom is important, but just as important is for students to know they have someone to turn to when they have a problem. Miss Criss, the administrative assistant in Student Affairs, is their shoulder to cry on, the knowledgeable mother who can give advice, and the great confidant. She doesn’t judge. In her eyes, everyone is equal and all deserve respect. “It behoov...